Best Practices for Writing Effective Test Cases

An effective test case happens to be one of the major aspects of developing quality-based effective software. Generally, well-structured test cases help identify bugs early, improve reliability, and reduce the possibility of shipping bugs into production. Following are some best practices that help guide you in writing effective test cases.

There is nothing you should do as a pretest activity before designing your test cases than to understand well the application functionality and requirements. Poor understanding of the requirements leads to gaps in testing. Early engagement with product owners, developers, and stakeholders will clarify ambiguities and ensure test coverage is aligned with what is intended for the product behavior.

Always maintain a Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) to connect each test case with its requirement.

Test cases should be understandable. Do not add any technical terminology or overly technical words that could leave other test engineers baffled, especially new members of the team. The more nicely a test case is authored, the more it can be maintained or reused in other projects.

Example: 

Instead of writing

Input valid data and click on the submit button.

Try writing

Input valid user details: username 'user123', password 'Pass@123'. Click on the 'Submit' button.

Consistent naming of test cases and the steps helps in readability as well as the easy finding of specific test cases. Implement a naming convention early and then apply it universally for all tests.

Example:

TC_Login_ValidCredentials_001

TC_Logout_ValidSession_002

It not only keeps all test cases nice and organized but makes tracing easier for debugging as well.

Both the positive testing and the fact that the application should not do it (negative testing) are critical. Negative testing includes testing for invalid inputs, edge cases, or unwanted behaviors.

Example:

Positive Test Case: "User logs in successfully with correct username and password."

Negative Test Case: "An error message is displayed by the system when an invalid password is entered by a user."

Each test case should not depend on the result of other tests. A failure of one test case should not propagate to make other test cases fail due to its failure. Independent test cases help pinpoint exactly at what point of failure it is and debugging will be more efficient.

Clearly mention the pre-conditions required for a test to be executed, such as user permissions and data setup. Likewise, post-conditions are to be mentioned by which all the cleanup activities and system reset that need to be done after the execution of the test are defined.

Example:

Pre-condition: The user is logged in with admin permissions.

Post-condition: User session will be terminated at the end of test execution.

Every test case should clearly define the expected outcome. This easily makes it clear to a tester if the test has passed or not, without even a minute trace of ambiguity. Don't say things like "Check if it works"; include measurable criteria for success instead.

Example:

"The system must display 'Account created successfully.' as the success message."

"The application should be left on the login page with an error message 'Invalid username or password.

Not all test cases are of equal priority; prioritize test cases based on how crucial these features are and the possible effects they will have on your business. You would, of course, test features that were mission-critical or had high user interaction first and most elaborately.

Use categories like High, Medium, and Low priority to categorize test cases.

While manual testing is the good part for exploratory tests or a completely new feature, automation of regression tests, and repeated tasks saves time and reduces the scope of human error. For every test case, mark it as either automated by using tools like Selenium, Cypress, or others.

Example:

Automation of login with valid and invalid credentials in every release to ensure its functionality.

Not only should your test cases adapt to the changes made by the application, but the review of test cases should be done periodically to ensure that test cases are valid and relevant to today's functionality. Inactive test cases should be archived or updated.

Schedule time regularly to review test cases. You will want to particularly review them following major feature releases or system updates.

Delivering quality software involves the most effective test cases. If all these best practices-mainly dealing with the understanding of requirements, making the case clear, giving importance to important tests, and embracing automation-are kept in mind, you will definitely be creating a robust testing process that catches defects earlier and makes the development lifecycle smoother.

Ready to transform your business with our technology solutions?   Contact Us today to Leverage Our QA Expertise.